Re: PITR Archive Recovery plus WIP PITR

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PITR Archive Recovery plus WIP PITR
Date: 2004-07-14 04:36:04
Message-ID: 200407140436.i6E4a4s28713@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> > what's not (yet)
> >> - Timelines...though I think they are useful, they may not be critical
>
> > I am not fond of the timeline idea, especially for 7.5. Let's get usage
> > cases submitted first. I can imagine timelines as causing significant
> > confusion during restore, which is the last thing we want to do.
>
> I think that judgment is exactly backward. *Not* having timelines is
> what will cause serious and possibly fatal mistakes during restore:
> people will hand the wrong xlog files to restore and the software will
> be unable to recognize the inconsistency.
>
> We really need to get this right the first time.

I assume they could just restore from backup and try again.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-07-14 04:45:10 Re: PITR Archive Recovery plus WIP PITR
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-07-14 04:31:36 Re: PITR Archive Recovery plus WIP PITR