From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
Date: | 2004-07-13 23:01:41 |
Message-ID: | 200407132301.i6DN1fb16205@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > So the situation is:
> > - You must only stop recovery at a point in time (in the logs) after the
> > backup had completed.
>
> Right.
>
> > No way to enforce that currently, apart from procedurally. Not exactly
> > frequent, so I think I just document that and move on, eh?
>
> The procedure that generates a backup has got to be responsible for
> recording both the start and stop times. If it does not do so then
> it's fatally flawed. (Note also that you had better be careful to get
> the time as seen on the server machine's clock ... this could be a nasty
> gotcha if the backup is run on a different machine, such as an NFS
> server.)
OK, but procedurally, how do you correlate the start/stop time of the
tar backup with the WAL numeric file names?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-07-13 23:13:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-13 22:56:31 | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-13 23:13:30 | Re: serverlog rotation/functions |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-13 23:00:11 | Re: [HACKERS] Is "trust" really a good default? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-13 23:13:30 | Re: serverlog rotation/functions |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-13 23:00:11 | Re: [HACKERS] Is "trust" really a good default? |