Re: Release planning (was: Re: Status report)

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Release planning (was: Re: Status report)
Date: 2004-07-13 22:05:55
Message-ID: 20040713190517.N789@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> We have always recommended upgrading to the most recent minor release,
> at least as a project policy for support. Also, the upgrade is only
> stop/install/restart so it is quite easy to do, and folks like the fact
> they don't have to test for new functionality.

Right, and this made sense when we were dealing with a release every 4
months or so ... now we're talking about one every year, or two ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan Gardner 2004-07-13 22:08:35 Re: Release planning (was: Re: Status report)
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-07-13 22:05:15 Re: Release planning (was: Re: Status report)