From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All |
Date: | 2004-07-12 00:32:11 |
Message-ID: | 20040712003211.GA8483@dcc.uchile.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 03:15:46PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> For that matter:
>
> begin;
> savepoint;
> select 0/0; -- abort
> savepoint; -- commands will be ignored
> select 1; -- commands will be ignored
> release; -- commands will be ignored
> release; -- abort main xact 'cause we didn't rollback
> commit; -- abort message
>
> Is the above more or less correct, Alvaro?
Save a minor detail. It would be
begin;
savepoint;
select 0/0; -- abort
savepoint; -- commands will be ignored
select 1; -- commands will be ignored
release; -- commands will be ignored
release; -- commands will be ignored
commit; -- abort message
Note that I'm trying to tell you something with the indenting; all those
commands are inside one and the same subtransaction.
And I'm not planning to do anonymous savepoint. Do these buy us
anything?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Find a bug in a program, and fix it, and the program will work today.
Show the program how to find and fix a bug, and the program
will work forever" (Oliver Silfridge)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-12 00:40:19 | Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-11 23:23:13 | Re: [Re] Re: PREPARE and transactions |