Re: client_min_messages in dumps?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: client_min_messages in dumps?
Date: 2004-07-11 21:50:11
Message-ID: 200407112150.i6BLoBS05747@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I also don't see LOG used much in the code at all. It seems to be used
> > mostly by VACUUM and ANALYZE. Seems something is wrong.
>
> There is nothing wrong except that you've forgotten how we designed
> VACUUM VERBOSE to work with the new logging-levels stuff... that is
> basically what INFO is for.
>

OK, it turns out only postgresql.conf was wrong about mentioning INFO as
a proper client_min_messages level. The SGML docs didn't mention it as
a value.

Added to TODO:

* Add NOVICE output level for helpful messages like automatic
sequence/index creation

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-07-11 22:01:29 Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All
Previous Message Mike Rylander 2004-07-11 17:06:02 Re: plperl (7.5)