Re: pg_dump --clean w/ <= 7.2 server

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump --clean w/ <= 7.2 server
Date: 2004-07-11 03:13:34
Message-ID: 200407110313.i6B3DY525123@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches


Where are we on this?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> writes:
> >> Possibly the most correct solution is to assign the name "public" to the
> >> dummy schema that pg_dump creates internally when talking to a pre-7.3
> >> server.
>
> > I was considering that they might want to restore the dump into another
> > schema and that would be easier with an unqualified name. I don't really
> > understand why the name needs to be fully qualified in the first place.
>
> Because it's entirely too likely that you'll drop the wrong thing if you
> issue an unqualified DROP.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-07-11 05:28:22 Re: OWNER TO mega patch #2
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-07-11 02:57:35 Re: Data directory with trailing [back]slash