Re: Status report

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Status report
Date: 2004-07-11 03:02:35
Message-ID: 200407110302.i6B32Z723606@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


If you get full control of PostgreSQL, you can dictate what will happen.
Until then, I will follow the community consensus, which may or may not
match your opinion.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >
> > My point is that it isn't the patch submitters we are waiting on
> > anymore. It is the backlog of patches that need review/adjustment.
>
> "Of course, many of the patches I kept need some adjustment to get applied
> ..." ... to me, that indicates that even after review, they will have to
> go back to the submitter to be adjusted, and sent back, and reviewed, and
> ...
>
> Get in what you feel comfortable adding over the next week, the rest can
> wait until 7.6 ...
>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-07-11 03:07:59 Re: PREPARE and transactions
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-07-11 02:58:09 Re: Status report