Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All
Date: 2004-07-10 22:15:13
Message-ID: 200407110015.13740.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> It seems anonymous savepoints really don't buy us anything. They
> don't match the Oracle behavior, and don't do anything more than
> nested transactions. I agree we want them, but I don't see the value
> they add value right now.

The value they add is that they follow the SQL standard, which is a lot
better sell than "proprietary transaction management scheme". Those
people who think they can redefine the SQL standard for purely
aesthetic reasons have paid the price over and over again.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-07-10 22:55:31 Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2004-07-10 22:00:22 Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All