| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | nobody <nobody(at)nowhere(dot)near(dot)here> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: win32 port |
| Date: | 2004-07-10 03:28:04 |
| Message-ID: | 20040710032804.GC28878@dcc.uchile.cl |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers-win32 |
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 02:01:57PM +0100, nobody wrote:
> The PostgreSQL traditionally refuses to run under root account on Unix (for
> security reasons). On win32 the situation is the same (it will not run if
> run under user belonging to administrator group).
> In my opinion this should not be the case on win32 as developers are likely
> to belong to the administrators group and might like to run the database
> under their account.
Nah, this has been proposed and rejected at least a couple of times
already. The reason is that Postgres does not want to be the next
worm-causing program out there. Sloppy security on the grounds of ease
of use is exactly the reason why Microsoft products are full of security
programs.
There's a reason for refusing to run as root on Unix, and the same
reason holds on Windows. Much more strongly, I might add.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Hay quien adquiere la mala costumbre de ser infeliz" (M. A. Evans)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-10 03:28:58 | Re: PGADMIN default storage EXTENDED for Character fields |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2004-07-10 02:13:08 | Re: win32 port |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-10 05:41:04 | Re: Weird new time zone |
| Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2004-07-10 02:18:20 | Re: PgSQL not as Administrator - probs on w |