From: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alberto Cabello Sanchez <alberto(at)unex(dot)es> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Column name 'user' not allowed? |
Date: | 2004-07-08 13:35:25 |
Message-ID: | 20040708062906.J90613@megazone.bigpanda.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Alberto Cabello Sanchez wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 05:17:08PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> > Thomas Mueller <news-exp-dec04(at)tmueller(dot)com> wrote:
> > > now I can create the table! I don't see a reason why column name USER
> > > isn't allowed?!
> >
> > Because it's a reserved word in PostgreSQL's SQL syntax.
> >
> > You can also work around this by enclosing the name in quotes. This also
> > makes the column name case-sensitive though, so you need to be sure that
> > _all_ processes/code/whatever that accesses this table can properly address
> > the column with the proper case. i.e. if you use "USER" and later try to
> > SELECT user FROM poc_user_account, you'll get an error that the column
> > doesn't exist.
>
> Even worse, you don't get an error at all, but you get your current connection
> username:
>
> alberto=# select user from pg_database;
> current_user
> --------------
> alberto
> alberto
> alberto
> (3 rows)
Right, because USER effectively means CURRENT_USER (as per the rules in
SQL92 6.2/SQL99 6.3). The choice of having USER be a reserved word which
basically means the same thing as CURRENT_USER by the committee doing the
SQL spec was unfortunate.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2004-07-08 13:57:57 | Re: unexpected update behavior with temp tables |
Previous Message | btober | 2004-07-08 13:26:55 | Re: SUBSTRING for a regular expression |