Re: LinuxTag wrapup

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LinuxTag wrapup
Date: 2004-07-06 20:01:54
Message-ID: 20040706165941.U71486@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Andreas Pflug wrote:

> An external tool helping translating sql is fine, but nothing to be
> defined todo for core pgsql IMHO. I still believe some minor "oracle
> helper" behaviour (not to call it oracle compatibility, to avoid wrong
> expectations) should be added. Currently, pgsql appears a bit arrogant
> towards those oracle centric people (always a matter of point of view,
> of course). We could avoid this by offering some concessions.

Actually, we had added awhile back a set of 'Oracle compability' stuff to
the backend, to handle some of the non-standard functions that Oracle
users had access to ... is there a reason why that can't be extended? Or
are we talking about *really* core changes here?

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2004-07-06 20:46:05 Initdb error
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2004-07-06 19:58:48 Re: Point in Time Recovery