Re: [BUGS] [CHECKER] 4 memory leaks in Postgresql 7.4.2

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] [CHECKER] 4 memory leaks in Postgresql 7.4.2
Date: 2004-07-05 20:23:28
Message-ID: 20040705202328.GA26728@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 07:50:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> It's entirely likely that ecpg's derivative of the backend's datetime
> modules contains lots and lots of memory leaks, since AFAIK the palloc
> infrastructure is not there in the ecpg environment :-(.

I wonder why is this? Is there some limitation to using palloc outside
the backend itself? I ask because I have considered using it outside
Postgres several times (a consideration that has never materialized
yet), and I wonder if it needs something special to work.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
Dios hizo a Adán, pero fue Eva quien lo hizo hombre.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-07-05 21:13:23 Re: [BUGS] [CHECKER] 4 memory leaks in Postgresql 7.4.2
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2004-07-05 18:55:09 Re: [CHECKER] 4 memory leaks in Postgresql 7.4.2

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2004-07-05 20:45:00 Point in Time Recovery
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-07-05 20:22:14 Re: serverlog rotation/functions