From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
---|---|
To: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [BUGS] [CHECKER] 4 memory leaks in Postgresql 7.4.2 |
Date: | 2004-07-05 20:23:28 |
Message-ID: | 20040705202328.GA26728@dcc.uchile.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 07:50:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> It's entirely likely that ecpg's derivative of the backend's datetime
> modules contains lots and lots of memory leaks, since AFAIK the palloc
> infrastructure is not there in the ecpg environment :-(.
I wonder why is this? Is there some limitation to using palloc outside
the backend itself? I ask because I have considered using it outside
Postgres several times (a consideration that has never materialized
yet), and I wonder if it needs something special to work.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
Dios hizo a Adán, pero fue Eva quien lo hizo hombre.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-05 21:13:23 | Re: [BUGS] [CHECKER] 4 memory leaks in Postgresql 7.4.2 |
Previous Message | Michael Meskes | 2004-07-05 18:55:09 | Re: [CHECKER] 4 memory leaks in Postgresql 7.4.2 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-07-05 20:45:00 | Point in Time Recovery |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-05 20:22:14 | Re: serverlog rotation/functions |