From: | "Bill" <bill(at)math(dot)uchicago(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Query performance |
Date: | 2004-06-28 17:02:40 |
Message-ID: | 200406281702.i5SH2YfL013269@math.uchicago.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Ok....so here lies the output of oclh (i.e "\d oclh")
Table "public.oclh"
Column | Type | Modifiers
--------+-----------------------+-------------------------------
symbol | character varying(10) | not null default ''
date | date | not null default '0001-01-01'
open | numeric(12,2) | not null default '0.00'
close | numeric(12,2) | not null default '0.00'
low | numeric(12,2) | not null default '0.00'
high | numeric(12,2) | not null default '0.00'
Indexes: symbol_2_oclh_index btree (symbol, date),
symbol_oclh_index btree (symbol, date)
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Richard Huxton
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 4:14 AM
To: Bill
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Query performance
Bill wrote:
> Actually, I have some queries that are slow, however I was wondering if
you
> could help me write a query that is rather simple, but I, as a true
database
> novice, can't seem to conjure. So we have stocks, as I have previously
> said, and I have a huge table which contains all of the opening and
closing
> prices of some stocks from each day.
Schemas, Bill - show us your table definitions so people can see exactly
where they stand.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim | 2004-06-28 17:44:03 | Re: SQL stupid query plan... terrible performance ! |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-06-28 16:47:59 | Re: postgres 7.4 at 100% |