| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Együd Csaba <csegyud(at)vnet(dot)hu> |
| Cc: | "Pgsql-General(at)Postgresql(dot)Org (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Performance problem on RH7.1 |
| Date: | 2004-06-27 01:37:45 |
| Message-ID: | 20040627013745.GB8513@dcc.uchile.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 12:16:17PM +0200, Együd Csaba wrote:
> I've a problem with the perfprmance of the production environment.
> I've two db servers. One on my laptop computer (2Ghz, 1GB, WinXP, Cygwin,
> Postgres 7.3.4) and one on a production server (2GHz, 1GB, Ultra SCSI,
> RH7.1, Postgres 7.3.2).
>
> I run the same dump and the same query on both of the computers. The
> difference is substantial.
> The query takes 5 times longer on the production server then on the laptop.
Are both databases properly vacuumed? Did you try a VACUUM FULL? I'm
wondering why it takes a lot of time seqscanning the t_products table in
the production server compared to the laptop.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Hoy es el primer día del resto de mi vida"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | wespvp | 2004-06-27 01:43:50 | Re: enable thready safety on Mac OS X 10.3.4 |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2004-06-27 01:36:13 | Re: Performance problem on RH7.1 |