From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Connection gets into state where all queries fail |
Date: | 2004-06-22 22:09:10 |
Message-ID: | 20040622220910.GB27296@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 03:06:39PM -0600, Scott Ribe wrote:
> OK, I'm using a pool of worker threads that each have a connection (from my
> own software, no PHP or anything like that involved), and a connection is in
> a state where all queries fail. Looking back through the log I find the
> first entry where this connection has an error (there are successful queries
> on it prior, so it's not the first query):
>
Your problem is that you have an error within a transaction and as the
error message states:
> 2004-06-21 14:51:58 [5589] ERROR: current transaction is aborted, queries
> ignored until end of transaction block
All your queries will be ignored until you complete the transaction,
either with a commit or a rollback. I find the message very clear, how
do you think it could be reworded to be more clear?
> - Is there something I need to do after an error like this, in order to get
> the connection back to a usable state?
COMMIT or ROLLBACK
> - Is this a bug?
In your program, yes. Although I find it interesting that your commit
is ignored after the error. Just send it as a seperate query.
> - Is there anything I can do to provide more information? I still have the
> server running right now, but I'm going to have to reboot soon because this
> is causing problems.
Just add a transaction commit or rollback after the error.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2004-06-22 22:12:23 | Re: flock user defined function |
Previous Message | Rick Gigger | 2004-06-22 21:55:07 | Re: [ANNOUNCE] == PostgreSQL Weekly News - June 22nd 2004 |