From: | Gary Stainburn <gary(dot)stainburn(at)ringways(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: subselect prob in view |
Date: | 2004-06-21 15:11:42 |
Message-ID: | 200406211611.42573.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Monday 21 Jun 2004 3:19 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> Gary Stainburn <gary(dot)stainburn(at)ringways(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> > from requests r, users u, request_types t,
> > request_states s, dealerships d, departments de, customers c
> > left outer join (select co_r_id, count(co_r_id) from comments
> > group by co_r_id) co on
> > co.co_r_id = r.r_id
> > psql:goole1.sql:45: ERROR: Relation "r" does not exist
>
> I think you have learned some bad habits from MySQL :-(
>
> PostgreSQL follows the SQL spec and makes JOIN bind more tightly than
> comma. Therefore, in the above the LEFT JOIN is only joining "c" to
> "co" and its JOIN ON clause can only reference those two relations.
>
> You could get the behavior you seem to expect by changing each comma
> in the from-list to CROSS JOIN. Then the JOINs all bind left-to-right
> and so "r" will be part of the left argument of the LEFT JOIN.
>
> Note that if you are using a pre-7.4 release this could have negative
> effects on performance --- see the user's guide concerning how explicit
> JOIN syntax constrains the planner.
>
> regards, tom lane
Thanks for this Tom, but I've never used MySQL.
I'll look at the docs and have another go.
Gary
--
Gary Stainburn
This email does not contain private or confidential material as it
may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown
and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jie Liang | 2004-06-21 16:28:38 | Re: Prepare Statement |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-21 14:19:43 | Re: subselect prob in view |