From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Tablespace patch review |
Date: | 2004-06-19 05:17:34 |
Message-ID: | 200406190517.i5J5HYn13055@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I should think that the table-level display ought to show both the
> >> relfilenode and tablespace OIDs for each table.
>
> > For objects in the default tablespace, they don't show a tablespace oid,
> > right? Where do we put it? A column that will be empty if they don't
> > use tablespaces?
>
> pg_class will show a zero for objects in the default tablespace, but
> I think oid2name should pull the actual tablespace ID from
> pg_database.dattablespace and show that. The convention about zero
> is just to make life simple for CREATE DATABASE --- users of oid2name
> should not have to think about it.
Well, I didn't use tablespaces here so the pg_tablespaces directory is
empty, so I can't think of what the tablespace is. Is it the database
oid? Also, are we calling it pg_tablespaces (plural) rather than
pg_tablespace?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-19 05:31:38 | Re: Twelve days to feature freeze |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-19 05:10:35 | Re: Tablespace patch review |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-19 05:39:39 | Re: Tablespace patch review |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-06-19 05:13:55 | Re: eventlog fix |