Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin Forum

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Donnacha Mac Gloinn <postgresql(dot)org(at)donnacha(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin Forum
Date: 2004-06-17 18:45:49
Message-ID: 20040617184549.GB3665@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 08:13:19PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> > My personal conjecture:
> >
> > The "extended insert" is not on the Postgres TODO list because:
> > a) It's not ANSI SQL standard.
> > b) We have COPY, which is better.
>
> Unfortunately that statement is mostly wrong:
> - It is on the TODO list.
> - It is standard.
> - It is better than COPY.

Why is it better than COPY?

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"No renuncies a nada. No te aferres a nada."

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-06-17 19:14:50 Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin Forum
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-06-17 18:13:19 Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin Forum