| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Donnacha Mac Gloinn <postgresql(dot)org(at)donnacha(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin Forum Software |
| Date: | 2004-06-17 02:17:09 |
| Message-ID: | 20040617021709.GD5925@dcc.uchile.cl |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 04:23:44PM -0800, Donnacha Mac Gloinn wrote:
> In a recent thread in the official vb forum
> (http://www.vbulletin.com/forum/showthread.php?t=97747&highlight=PostgreSQL)
> one Pgsql advocate sang its praises, in particular advanced indexing,
> and a vb developer, Scott MacVicar, responded "I love Postgresql too but
> they are missing a vital part that we've become dependant on..". He
> then linked to the Pgsql ToDo list and indicated that the current lack
> of " Allow INSERT INTO tab (col1, ..) VALUES (val1, ..), (val2, ..)" was
> his bone of contention there.
You got to be kidding. Are you saying that they can't work around the
lack of this SELECT syntax, but that they _did_ work around the lack of
stored procedures (and who knows what else) in MySQL?
Is there _no other_ feature they miss in PostgreSQL?
Anyway, if they want a feature, they can as well fund development of it.
INSERT with multiple values can't be that hard -- it's never been
implemented because there has been no real push for it. I don't foresee
it being implemented in any short term future.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Use it up, wear it out, make it do, or do without"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-06-17 02:47:59 | Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-06-17 00:36:45 | Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin Forum |