From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Improving postgresql.conf |
Date: | 2004-06-16 16:16:41 |
Message-ID: | 20040616161641.GZ11196@ns.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Greg Stark (gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu) wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > The only real problem I see is that showing all the values as comments
> > encourages the idea that you can undo a change by undoing your edit.
> > The simple and obvious fix is to not show the values as comments ...
>
> Well even if you don't show them (and it would be most frustrating for users
> if you don't) it's certainly expected that commenting something out returns it
> to the default value. It's how just about every other piece of software works.
> I can lend my own experience as one data point that I was totally surprised
> when I found out it didn't work the way I expected.
I was suprised too. I havn't tested yet, but do even other things act
this way? I'm thinking mainly of pg_hba.conf which I didn't think did,
but not sure.
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-06-16 16:32:01 | Re: Improving postgresql.conf |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2004-06-16 16:06:09 | Re: Improving postgresql.conf |