Re: building 7.4.3 on Solaris 9/Intel

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Parker <dparker(at)tazznetworks(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: building 7.4.3 on Solaris 9/Intel
Date: 2004-06-16 03:48:37
Message-ID: 200406160348.i5G3mbM20005@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


OK, I have fixed this so the configure test happens with the proper
thread flags. Patch attached, and it will be in 7.4.4.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

David Parker wrote:
> Seems to be, which is why I originally asked about configure switches,
> but it seems like just
> --enable-thread-safety ought to be enough.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Seymour [mailto:jseymour(at)linxnet(dot)com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 5:41 PM
> To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] building 7.4.3 on Solaris 9/Intel
>
> "David Parker" <dparker(at)tazznetworks(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the response. Yup, I'm sure it's 7.4.3.
> >
> > From the config.log, it looks like the check for getpwuid_r test
> > program uses -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS, which turns on the POSIX
> > version of the call, but the check for "fifth argument" test compile
> > doesn't include this define, so it fails, and the GETPWUID_R_5ARG
> doesn't get set:
> [snip]
>
> So it's actually a configure problem.
>
> Jim
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 1.8 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-06-16 04:21:00 Re: "Interesting" query planning for timestamp ranges in where clause?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-06-16 03:12:12 Re: postgresql.conf for pg_stat_activity