| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: #postgresql report |
| Date: | 2004-06-15 15:48:32 |
| Message-ID: | 20040615154832.GS11196@ns.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Jeff (threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org) wrote:
> True enough, however it is still a common topic on the channel.
It's good to let people who are asking know there's an option though.
I'm on the channel too, and do let people know when I see them asking
about it but I'm in 20-odd other channels. :)
> Not everyone is too keen on using backports either.
True enough, though in that case the Debian release management is likely
exactly what they're looking for.
> Just reporting what I was seeing in the channel.
Sure.
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pierre Emmanuel Gros | 2004-06-15 16:24:22 | Re: constraint upon view |
| Previous Message | Jeff | 2004-06-15 15:39:43 | Re: #postgresql report |