From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Darcy Buskermolen <darcy(at)wavefire(dot)com>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Clean up generation of |
Date: | 2004-06-13 07:32:10 |
Message-ID: | 20040613153103.Q21336-100000@houston.familyhealth.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
> The right way to do this at the C level would be to use the same
> infrastructure as nextval() does to accept arguments like 'foo' and
> '"Foo"."Bar"'. There's no reason to restrict the two-argument form
> to the current search_path.
Is it possible to do that in SQL? eg. is there anything you can do to go:
select '"Foo"."Bar"'::regclassoid;
Or something?
I'm trying to avoid doing it in C as it seems like it would be a pita.
Chris
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-06-13 09:06:22 | Re: plperlng - testimport: try 7 |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-06-13 04:15:37 | Re: plperlng - testimport: try 8 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2004-06-13 08:07:24 | Re: I just got it: PostgreSQL Application Server -- a new project. |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-06-13 06:32:38 | Re: Nested transactions and tuple header info |