From: | Martin Pitt <martin(at)piware(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org, Roland Zippel <zippel(at)linux-m68k(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Build failure on m68k and ia64: inconsistent operand constraints in an `asm' |
Date: | 2004-06-13 08:22:52 |
Message-ID: | 20040613082252.GA2754@donald.intranet.fbn-dd.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-ports |
Hi again!
On 2004-06-10 15:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think Debian broke their compiler and they ought to un-break it.
I asked Roland again, and got:
On 2004-06-11 10:10 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> gcc developers disagree, we had same problem with the kernel, e.g. see:
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=107475162200773&w=2
>
> There is nothing broken with the compiler and changing the constraints of
> the memory operand to a "=m"/"m" pair is correctly understood by all
> versions of gcc.
Hmm. Since I cannot judge anyway, maybe you two can discuss that
directly and I implement whatever consensus you will reach?
Thanks and have a nice Sunday!
Martin
--
Martin Pitt Debian GNU/Linux Developer
martin(at)piware(dot)de mpitt(at)debian(dot)org
http://www.piware.de http://www.debian.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-13 17:38:43 | Re: Build failure on m68k and ia64: inconsistent operand constraints in an `asm' |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-10 19:15:31 | Re: Build failure on m68k and ia64: inconsistent operand constraints in an `asm' |