From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Why hash indexes suck |
Date: | 2004-06-10 11:56:47 |
Message-ID: | 200406101156.i5ABulF10175@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> [blink] This seems to miss out on the actual point of the thread (hash
> >> bucket size shouldn't be a disk page) in favor of an entirely
> >> unsupported sub-suggestion.
>
> > Yes, I was unsure of the text myself. I have changed it to:
> > * Allow hash buckets to fill disk pages, rather than being
> > sparse
>
> OK, though maybe "pack hash index buckets onto disk pages more
> efficiently" would be clearer.
OK, updated.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2004-06-10 11:57:59 | Re: Improving postgresql.conf |
Previous Message | SZŰCS Gábor | 2004-06-10 09:40:59 | Re: simple_heap_update: tuple concurrently updated -- during INSERT |