Re: index with LIKE

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Henrik Steffen <steffen(at)topconcepts(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: index with LIKE
Date: 2004-06-09 20:10:11
Message-ID: 20040609201011.GA24652@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 09:00:31AM +0200, Henrik Steffen wrote:
>
> hello all,
>
> on my master-db-server i'm running postgres 7.4.1,
> and I have got two slave-servers running postgres 7.4.2

<snip>

> Is there such a difference in 7.4.1 to 7.4.2 ?
>
> A retardation of 722 ms is not acceptable for me, and I don't see why
> the indexes are not used.
> Do you have an idea? I have run VACUUM ANALYZE several times, and
> REINDEX TABLE foo and even
> DROPped and reCREATEd the index. Didn't help.

The classic issue is what encoding are the databases. Anything other
than C and like won't use indexes.

Also, you did a vacuum analyze on both, right?

Hope this helps,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Seymour 2004-06-09 20:32:01 Re: Multiple databases on seperate drives/file systems?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2004-06-09 20:09:45 Re: postgres on SuSE 9.1