From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Bugs List <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #1145: silent REVOKE failures |
Date: | 2004-06-09 17:40:13 |
Message-ID: | 200406091740.i59HeDA08234@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> > >> For the TODO, I would suggest something general:
> > >> - fix grant/revoke wrt SQL standard, validate errors, warnings and successes.
> >
> > > Tom, is this done?
> >
> > I think so. At least, we're a lot closer to spec than we were.
>
> Indeed.
>
> Maybe the validation part could be improved somehow, with test cases
> build from the sql specification and the expected behavior checked
> against the actual behavior.
>
> What I derived from the many discussion and time I spent on the standard
> is that there is a lot of subtlety involved.
>
> So maybe the following TODO could be kept:
>
> - validate grant/revoke (error, warning, success0 wrt sql standard
>
> I may be interested in implementing ROLEs someday, and such tests would be
> welcome just to check that nothing is broken.
Unless someone can say it is wrong I am not inclinded to add a TODO item
that is only possible.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Don Zola | 2004-06-09 19:04:34 | 7.4.2 initdb core dumping on solaris 2.8 |
Previous Message | Crispin Miller | 2004-06-09 16:36:35 | Identifying cause of "database system shutdown was interrupted" at failed startup |