Re: Nested xacts: looking for testers and review

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Nested xacts: looking for testers and review
Date: 2004-06-09 22:35:39
Message-ID: 20040609153240.M95501@megazone.bigpanda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 04:07:27AM -0700, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> > On Sat, 29 May 2004, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > > Ah, this seems to work. I'll implement it and I'll let you know how it
> > > goes.
> >
> > Ugh... There's one further wrinkle I hadn't thought about, imagine the
> > following:
>
> Ok Stephan, thank you very much for your help. I implemented this and
> it seems to work, at least on my (limited?) test scenario. If you have
> some spare time I'd like you to test it and see if you can break it (I
> posted it to -patches yesterday).

Unfortunately, I've gotten it to fail, but I haven't looked in depth (I'm
at work, so I'm doing it during compilations and such.)

I made a file ins with a 1000000 line copy to a table named fk with the
value 1, and then if I do the following:

create table pk(a int primary key);
create table fk(a int references pk(a) initially deferred);
insert into pk values (1);

begin;
begin;
\i ins
\i ins
rollback;
\i ins
commit;

It appears to exception on the third \i ins with the tail_thisxact
pointing into a bad place.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2004-06-09 22:55:44 Re: Frequently updated tables
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-06-09 21:04:16 Re: proposal: be smarter about i/o patterns in index scan