From: | Chris Ryan <xgbe(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | darren(at)up(dot)hrcoxmail(dot)com, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Chris Ryan <xgbe(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] The pgreplication project |
Date: | 2004-06-08 16:09:38 |
Message-ID: | 20040608160938.20962.qmail@web40002.mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
Jan,
The Top projects list is a dynamic list based on a cumulative page
views. Occassionally the ranking is scalled or zero'd to give newer
projects a chance to compete for the top rankings with older more
established projects. This last occurred a few months ago.
Hope this answers your question.
Chris Ryan
--- Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> On 6/8/2004 11:04 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Jan Wieck wrote:
> >> On 6/8/2004 9:58 AM, darren(at)up(dot)hrcoxmail(dot)com wrote:
> >>
> >> >> I guess I have to address a slightly broader audience, or do I
> conclude
> >> >> from the total lack of interest in this matter that nobody
> cares if we
> >> >> promote something here as one of our "top five" flagship
> projects, that
> >> >> is inactive for years and still a prototype implementation
> against
> >> >> PostgreSQL 6.4 with no ideas how to incorporate the semantic
> changes of
> >> >> MVCC into the concept.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Jan,
> >> >
> >> > Perhaps you should contact the project admin or at least
> >> > posting to the project mailing list, before assuming the
> >> > project is dead. Admittedly there has been several
> >> > delays and periods of inactivity, but declaring a
> >> > project dead without investigating is quite
> >> > inappropriate.
> >>
> >> I apologize and admit that it should have been posted to the
> project
> >> mailing list.
> >
> > I assumed the top-5 projects are dynamic based on the amount of
> > activity, not hardcoded as they seem to be.
> >
>
> Looking at "orapgsqlviews", which had the last CVS commit 3 years ago
>
> and is still clinging to its top-5 position, I don't think so. Chris?
>
>
> Jan
>
> --
>
#======================================================================#
> # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being
> right. #
> # Let's break this rule - forgive me.
> #
> #==================================================
> JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | elein | 2004-06-08 21:09:21 | PostgreSQL BoF Session at OSCON |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-06-08 15:55:38 | Re: [GENERAL] The pgreplication project |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2004-06-08 18:34:00 | Re: Multiple databases on seperate drives/file systems? |
Previous Message | Scot L. Harris | 2004-06-08 16:00:34 | Multiple databases on seperate drives/file systems? |