From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar(at)frodo(dot)hserus(dot)net> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Failures with windows port |
Date: | 2004-06-08 14:37:55 |
Message-ID: | 200406081437.i58Ebt509299@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> > Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> >> Leaving it for a full build as I am calling it a day. Will give it
> >> another go tomorrow morning..
> >>
> >
> > What you would need to test is not #ifdefing the whole thing out -
> > rather you would need to enable the fputc by removing the #ifndef and
> > #endif lines.
>
> Hmm.. good.. It worked. 1 out of 95 tests failed. Join is the test that is failed.
>
> Now I can go about installing and playing with it. I should use CVS in future
> though..
> And BTW, I was not running the regression in a cygwin shell. It was a msys shell
> only. ....
Can someone confirm that the newer 1.10 MinGW doesn't need the psql
print.c newline hack? If so, we can do a version test in that area and
mark it down as a mingw version-specific bug.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2004-06-08 14:45:08 | Re: sequences and "addval('myseq', value)" |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-08 14:37:13 | Re: Question regarding dynamic_library_path |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-06-08 14:57:28 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Failures with windows port |
Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2004-06-08 12:39:45 | Re: [HACKERS] Failures with windows port |