From: | Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar(at)frodo(dot)hserus(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Converting postgresql.conf parameters to kilobytes |
Date: | 2004-06-02 15:33:45 |
Message-ID: | 200406022103.45121.shridhar@frodo.hserus.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday 02 June 2004 20:59, Tom Lane wrote:
> Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org> writes:
> > This may be an unreasonable suggestion, but how about allowing both?
> > I've seen several configuration systems do the following:
> >
> > shared_buffers = 10000 ( shared_buffers in pages )
> > shared_buffers = 100M ( 100 MBs of shared_buffers )
> > shared_buffers = 2048K ( 2MBs of shared_buffers )
>
> I could live with that. I'm not sure how painful it would be to wedge
> into GUC though; and I have a feeling that it is exactly *not* what
> Shridhar would think is simpler than the present behavior ;-)
Usability POV, I could live with that. That would mean converting the GUC from
int to string though.
Shridhar
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-02 15:35:01 | Re: ACLs versus ALTER OWNER |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-02 15:29:47 | Re: Converting postgresql.conf parameters to kilobytes |