From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Official Freeze Date for 7.5: July 1st, 2004 |
Date: | 2004-06-02 03:08:00 |
Message-ID: | 200406020308.i52380g27524@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> That seems to indicate that at that stage, barely 2 months ago, the
> month was not definite, let alone the day.
>
> I confess that as a newcomer I was not around before the 7.4 cycle, so
> saying that people should have known the freeze date because it is
> following past patterns doesn't help me much. Are people supposed to
> obtain this info by trawling mailing list archives years back, or by
> some sort of divine revelation? Other OS projects manage this whole
> process better, IMNSHO. I'm not trying to point fingers, but to get
> future improvement.
I sent this email on April 16th asking for a status on the big 7.5
features:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-06-02 03:17:40 | Re: Nested transactions and tuple header info |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-06-02 03:00:03 | Re: Converting postgresql.conf parameters to kilobytes |