Re: Official Freeze Date for 7.5: July 1st, 2004

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Official Freeze Date for 7.5: July 1st, 2004
Date: 2004-06-02 03:08:00
Message-ID: 200406020308.i52380g27524@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> That seems to indicate that at that stage, barely 2 months ago, the
> month was not definite, let alone the day.
>
> I confess that as a newcomer I was not around before the 7.4 cycle, so
> saying that people should have known the freeze date because it is
> following past patterns doesn't help me much. Are people supposed to
> obtain this info by trawling mailing list archives years back, or by
> some sort of divine revelation? Other OS projects manage this whole
> process better, IMNSHO. I'm not trying to point fingers, but to get
> future improvement.

I sent this email on April 16th asking for a status on the big 7.5
features:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-06-02 03:17:40 Re: Nested transactions and tuple header info
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-06-02 03:00:03 Re: Converting postgresql.conf parameters to kilobytes