| From: | Jonathan Gardner <jgardner(at)jonathangardner(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexey Borzov <borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: have you seen this? |
| Date: | 2004-05-28 20:23:45 |
| Message-ID: | 200405281323.45816.jgardner@jonathangardner.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thursday 27 May 2004 11:36 pm, Alexey Borzov wrote:
>
> And that is the problem with PostgreSQL advocacy effort: they explain why
> their product is *good*, while everyone else explains why their product
> is *better*.
>
> See my point?
>
Compare the following two messages:
"MySQL is horrible. Use PostgreSQL."
versus:
"PostgreSQL is excellent. Use PostgreSQL."
In the end, that is what the PHBs (and PHP users and everyone else...) will
read and remember. Let's choose our message wisely.
I enjoy PostgreSQL half because it is superior and half because Tom Lane and
Josh Berkus and everyone else who is a contributor are just plain old nice
guys. Our community is built on friendly relationships within and without -
including the MySQL, Microsoft, and Oracle communities. Our community
includes rather than excludes. Our community encourages rather than
discourages. Our community compliments rather than criticizes. Let's keep
it that way.
--
Jonathan Gardner
jgardner(at)jonathangardner(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrei Badea | 2004-05-31 15:10:14 | Many databases on a PostgreSQL server |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2004-05-28 15:25:16 | Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL |