hash, rtree and gist ScanLists

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: hash, rtree and gist ScanLists
Date: 2004-05-28 04:05:41
Message-ID: 20040528040541.GA14068@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hackers,

I am updating the ScanLists so they can be dropped at subtransaction
abort. Currently they are stored with custom "next" pointers; however
it would be much cleaner to deal with deleting single items if they were
Lists. Is it OK if I change them to be so?

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Uno combate cuando es necesario... ¡no cuando está de humor!
El humor es para el ganado, o para hacer el amor, o para tocar el
baliset. No para combatir." (Gurney Halleck)

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-05-28 04:40:14 Re: Win32, PITR, nested transactions, tablespaces
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2004-05-28 04:00:33 Re: Win32, PITR, nested transactions, tablespaces