Re: commit messages from gforge -> pgsql-committers

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: commit messages from gforge -> pgsql-committers
Date: 2004-05-21 05:35:00
Message-ID: 20040521023423.E5739@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 21 May 2004, Neil Conway wrote:

> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > Tom appears to be against, everyone else seems to be for ... should we try
> > it and see how it works out?
>
> Sure, although I personally think Andrew's suggestion of creating a
> separate (non-archived) list that includes the full diff is the best
> solution. That satisfies both of Tom's gripes: it is "bulky", yes, but
> those who are against "bulkiness" can just subscribe to the old list,
> and it won't bloat the size of the list archives.

Can you have two DEFAULT lines in loginfo/commitinfo? Seems to defeat the
concept of "default" :0

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-05-21 05:47:54 Re: commit messages from gforge -> pgsql-committers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-05-21 05:33:38 Re: commit messages from gforge -> pgsql-committers