From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: commit messages from gforge -> pgsql-committers |
Date: | 2004-05-21 05:35:00 |
Message-ID: | 20040521023423.E5739@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 21 May 2004, Neil Conway wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > Tom appears to be against, everyone else seems to be for ... should we try
> > it and see how it works out?
>
> Sure, although I personally think Andrew's suggestion of creating a
> separate (non-archived) list that includes the full diff is the best
> solution. That satisfies both of Tom's gripes: it is "bulky", yes, but
> those who are against "bulkiness" can just subscribe to the old list,
> and it won't bloat the size of the list archives.
Can you have two DEFAULT lines in loginfo/commitinfo? Seems to defeat the
concept of "default" :0
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-05-21 05:47:54 | Re: commit messages from gforge -> pgsql-committers |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-05-21 05:33:38 | Re: commit messages from gforge -> pgsql-committers |