Re: commit messages from gforge -> pgsql-committers

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: commit messages from gforge -> pgsql-committers
Date: 2004-05-20 23:00:26
Message-ID: 20040520230026.GA7868@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 06:07:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> > Personally I'd prefer the entire diff to be attached to each -committers
> > mail, which would circumvent this problem. Would others find that
> > objectionable?
>
> Yes --- way too bulky, not to mention it turns the list archive into a
> duplicate of the CVS store. URLs pointing to the individual file diffs
> on the cvsweb interface sound reasonable, though.

It's easy to make a non-archived list which would contain the commit
messages with diffs, and keep pgsql-committers with only the URLs to
cvsweb ...

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"El sabio habla porque tiene algo que decir;
el tonto, porque tiene que decir algo" (Platon).

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-05-20 23:02:26 Re: [COMMITTERS] attempt at a multi file commit, to seee how it
Previous Message PostgreSQL Daemon 2004-05-20 22:54:20 attempt at a multi file commit, to seee how it formats