| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, lowen(at)pari(dot)edu, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com, chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
| Date: | 2004-05-19 04:04:56 |
| Message-ID: | 20040519.130456.112624363.t-ishii@sra.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Tue, 18 May 2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > Actually plPHP doesn't require the PostgreSQL source tree... you would
> > just have to modify the Make file to point to the right places.
>
> So, why tie it into the PostgreSQL source tree? Won't it be popular
> enough to live on its own, that it has to be distributed as part of the
> core?
At least in Japan PHP is much more popular than Python. If we have
plpython in core, I see no reason we do not have plPHP in core at
least from the "popularity" point of view.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-05-19 04:31:14 | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-05-19 03:43:49 | Re: Clean-up callbacks for non-SR functions |