Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Marko Karppinen <marko(at)karppinen(dot)fi>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
Date: 2004-05-18 19:20:03
Message-ID: 200405182120.03581.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marko Karppinen wrote:
> I guess the key thing is that pgFoundry shouldn't be a community
> distinct from the core. The same community standards need to apply
> on both sides of the fence.

Yes, and the best way to achieve that would be to not have anything to
pgfoundry and keep everything in the core.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-05-18 19:25:47 Re: Relocatable installs
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-05-18 19:19:05 Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion