Re: running as a service?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org, andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: running as a service?
Date: 2004-05-16 19:49:07
Message-ID: 200405161949.i4GJn7P15709@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32

Dave Page wrote:
> It's rumoured that Marc G. Fournier once said:
> > On Fri, 14 May 2004, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> What are the current plans regarding running PG as a service? A
> >> wrapper, or integrated code? If a wrapper, will it be put in the core,
> >> or done as something like a contrib or pgfoundry project?
> >
> > IF a wrapper, should be pgfoundry ... *but*, wouldn't integratd by
> > cleaner?
> >
> > would a wrapper be faster/easier? maybe aim for that for 7.5, and full
> > integration for 7.6?
>
> Service code is simple - Claudio already posted a wrapper, and I offered
> to provide an integrated solution as I did for autovacuum. (what happened
> to that btw - did it get applied?)
> Regards Dave.

It is hanging waiting to find out of pg_autovacuum will be integrated.
If not, it will be applied.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Luckhurst 2004-05-16 23:23:39 Re: Runtime Problems
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-05-16 10:13:17 Re: Runtime Problems