From: | Paolo Tavalazzi <ptavalazzi(at)charta(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | slow query if add order by |
Date: | 2004-05-14 13:37:58 |
Message-ID: | 200405141537.58772.ptavalazzi@charta.it |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I have 2 query that differ only for order by clause.
The time of execution of the two query is a lot of different.
1) explain analyze
select
tkstore.gruppo,tkstore.cassa,enabledcodes.sala,spettacoli.code
from
tkstore,enabledcodes,spettacoli
where
tkstore.id = enabledcodes.tkstore_id and
tkstore.gruppo in ('amit') and
enabledcodes.sala = spettacoli.teatro and
spettacoli.system = 0 ;
The explain is :
Hash Join (cost=173.06..3810.20 rows=115782 width=42) (actual
time=16.248..1265.331 rows=380736 loops=1)
Hash Cond: ("outer".teatro = "inner".sala)
-> Seq Scan on spettacoli (cost=0.00..1342.35 rows=23935 width=24)
(actual time=0.012..35.999 rows=26846 loops=1)
Filter: (system = 0)
-> Hash (cost=168.28..168.28 rows=1913 width=31) (actual
time=15.995..15.995 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Hash Join (cost=4.47..168.28 rows=1913 width=31) (actual
time=1.021..12.693 rows=5076 loops=1)
Hash Cond: ("outer".tkstore_id = "inner".id)
-> Seq Scan on enabledcodes (cost=0.00..113.45 rows=6245
width=16) (actual time=0.007..3.439 rows=6245 loops=1)
-> Hash (cost=4.39..4.39 rows=34 width=23) (actual
time=0.213..0.213 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on tkstore (cost=0.00..4.39 rows=34
width=23) (actual time=0.024..0.187 rows=33 loops=1)
Filter: ((gruppo)::text = 'amit'::text)
Total runtime: 1330.843 ms
2) explain analyze
select
tkstore.gruppo,tkstore.cassa,enabledcodes.sala,spettacoli.code
from
tkstore,enabledcodes,spettacoli
where
tkstore.id = enabledcodes.tkstore_id and
tkstore.gruppo in ('amit') and
enabledcodes.sala = spettacoli.teatro and
spettacoli.system = 0
order by 2;
The explain is :
Sort (cost=13548.08..13837.53 rows=115782 width=42) (actual
time=10631.389..10774.964 rows=380736 loops=1)
Sort Key: tkstore.cassa
-> Hash Join (cost=173.06..3810.20 rows=115782 width=42) (actual
time=16.227..1392.206 rows=380736 loops=1)
Hash Cond: ("outer".teatro = "inner".sala)
-> Seq Scan on spettacoli (cost=0.00..1342.35 rows=23935 width=24)
(actual time=0.011..47.329 rows=26846 loops=1)
Filter: (system = 0)
-> Hash (cost=168.28..168.28 rows=1913 width=31) (actual
time=16.018..16.018 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Hash Join (cost=4.47..168.28 rows=1913 width=31) (actual
time=1.023..12.680 rows=5076 loops=1)
Hash Cond: ("outer".tkstore_id = "inner".id)
-> Seq Scan on enabledcodes (cost=0.00..113.45
rows=6245 width=16) (actual time=0.008..3.469 rows=6245 loops=1)
-> Hash (cost=4.39..4.39 rows=34 width=23) (actual
time=0.214..0.214 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on tkstore (cost=0.00..4.39 rows=34
width=23) (actual time=0.023..0.181 rows=33 loops=1)
Filter: ((gruppo)::text = 'amit'::text)
Total runtime: 10858.720 ms
The db is ANALYZED;
Which is the reason of this difference??
What can I do ??
Thank
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-05-14 14:03:17 | Re: Scary behavior after power failure |
Previous Message | Fred Fung | 2004-05-14 13:11:19 | Re: dbmirror |