From: | joseph speigle <joe(dot)speigle(at)jklh(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Storing Perl objects |
Date: | 2004-05-12 16:18:30 |
Message-ID: | 20040512161830.GA23539@www.sirfsup.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
SPOPS, too
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 09:36:45PM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Kynn,
>
> > I understand that PostgreSQL has OO capabilities.
>
> Nope! Bzzzzzzzz. Thank you for playing. ;-)
>
> We are Object-Relational, not Object Oriented. Object-Relational has to do
> with our custom data types, operators, aggregates, and table inheritance. It
> is not OO, or even really analogous.
>
> > Is it possible to
> > store full-blown Perl objects in a PostgreSQL table? (I suppose that
> > one can always serialize Perl objects and store the serialized text,
> > but this is hardly OO.)
>
> I suggest using Alzabo. Look it up on Freshmeat.
>
> --
> Josh Berkus
> Aglio Database Solutions
> San Francisco
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
--
joe speigle
www.sirfsup.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2004-05-12 16:33:13 | Re: ORDER BY and Unicode |
Previous Message | M. Bastin | 2004-05-12 15:30:28 | Re: ORDER BY and Unicode |