Re: XLog: how to log?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: XLog: how to log?
Date: 2004-05-11 22:29:33
Message-ID: 20040511222933.GA6042@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 11:07:47PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:

> On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 22:26, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> > Right. What I was saying is that we don't need pg_subtrans info,
> > because that's only needed while the subtransaction is marked as
> > "subcommitted" but it's parent hasn't committed or aborted yet. The
> > subcommitted status is changed to committed/aborted when the main
> > transaction commits or aborts; at recovery time, we already know if that
> > happenned or not so we can mark it right away.
>
> Maybe I'm just not following you, which seems likely.
>
> Surely it is possible that a subtrans could abort, yet the fulltrans
> commits. Yet that doesn't in any way imply that the subtrans should
> change from aborted to committed?

The subtransaction will be recorded as aborted in pg_clog (I mean there
will be a XLog record saying that it aborted). That protects it from
showing as committed, no matter what happens to the parent xact.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"La tristeza es un muro entre dos jardines" (Khalil Gibran)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-05-11 23:03:39 Re: XLog: how to log?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-05-11 22:19:12 Re: XLog: how to log?