From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: XLog: how to log? |
Date: | 2004-05-11 21:01:45 |
Message-ID: | 200405112101.i4BL1jw09259@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> During recovery, we would search for a timestamp. If found exactly,
> stop. If exceeded, stop. Any transactions not committed at that point
> are, as we say, out of luck. ....This approach has a certainty about it
> that I think is much better than the error prone Xid hunting approach,
> and is also more attuned to the human reality (time matters, Xids
> don't).
>
> Earlier, Bruce and I had discussed that for reasons of time pressure,
> the PITR code for this release would consist of
> a) recovery to a particular Xid
> b) later, a utility that allowed xlogs to be inspected to allow DBA to
> decide which is the correct Xid to recover to.
> Those ideas don't sound as good now....
>
> Therefore: action on me? - add a timestamp to EACH xlog record -
> something I had been shying away from.
Many transactions are going to have the same timestamp because that just
isn't precise enough to choose a particular transaction. I agree
finding a particular xid in the logs is hard. We could just scan the
logs to see if we find the xid before doing the recovery.
Anyway, I though we agreed to just get total recovery working for 7.5
and we can deal with recovery to a particular point later. Or we can
just add timestamps to the wal file header and restore to a particular
wal file date timestamp.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Brusser | 2004-05-11 21:09:17 | database errors |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-05-11 21:00:08 | Re: Module dependency on PostgeSQL version |