| From: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)ufgnet(dot)ufg(dot)br> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Comments on all system objects |
| Date: | 2004-05-10 12:07:41 |
| Message-ID: | 20040510090741.1f6bcd33.euler@ufgnet.ufg.br |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi all,
> > The ability to comment on all types of catalog objects or actual
> > comments on all predefined catalog objects? Both are more or less
> > reasonable. But I think we should have some sort of
> > internationalization mechanism for the actual comments.
>
> One of my first commits for 7.5 was the format, I added being able to
> comment on about 5 new objects. I intended the latter. I guess I could
> clean up the functions and operators like Tom indicated, but that's all
> I'll do I guess.
>
> Internationalisation...hmmm...I don't know how to do that. Can you put
> gettext around the builtins stuff?
>
Maybe design something like in psql. A perl script that grabs the help from an SGML document.
Internationalisation? Maybe when some groups provides the translation of an SGML.
--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
euler (at) ufgnet.ufg.br
Desenvolvedor Web e Administrador de Sistemas
UFGNet - Universidade Federal de Goiás
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-05-10 12:27:03 | Re: CLUSTER locking |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-05-10 11:46:32 | Re: CLUSTER locking |