Re: XID Data Types

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, Ericson Smith <eric(at)did-it(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: XID Data Types
Date: 2004-05-07 03:58:10
Message-ID: 200405070358.i473wAx28664@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> Should we just get that into our CVS so Slony doesn't have to distribute
> >> its own?
>
> > It has to anyway, at least as long as it is supposed to be a version
> > upgrade aid that supports replicating from 7.3.x or 7.4.x
>
> No doubt ... but I agree that we *should* push full comparison support
> for type XID into CVS.

Yes, let's at least match it so we can have testing of the code in both
places, and prevent the need to load them in if the version is new
enough.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-05-07 04:30:28 Re: Interpreting vacuum verbosity
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-05-07 03:39:42 Re: XID Data Types