Re: regression failures - further data

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: regression failures - further data
Date: 2004-05-06 23:03:27
Message-ID: 200405062303.i46N3So21786@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> No, this is running with the patch that suppresses that. Basically, for
> some reason that I have been unable to find, and which leaves no log
> trace, copy just stops after about 4 or 5 lines, and then there are a
> bunch of consequent failures. I can't account for it yet. All I do know is
> that it happens when the tests are run with high parallelism and doesn't
> with no or low parallelism.

Not surprising. We expect to have these problems with such a new port.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-05-07 01:12:11 Re: regression failures - further data
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-05-06 22:51:41 Re: regression failures - further data