Re: regression failures - further data

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> I have managed (with a lot of effort) to track down the apparent cause
> of the regression failures I was seeing. They appear to be directly
> related to the degree of parallelism with which the tests are run. I can
> reliably get a 100% clean run on the serial tests, and on the parallel
> tests with MAX_CONNECTIONS=5. But if I run at MAX_CONNECTIONS=10 I
> (almost) always get failures, which for some reason that is beyond me
> start with the copy test, which isn't even run in parallel with other tests.
>
> This is all quite worrying, and suggests that we will need to do some
> careful stress testing before we can release this.
>
> Is there some W2K parameter I can tweak in the TCP stack that might
> alleviate the problem?

Is this the extra newline regression failure you were seeing?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073