Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup

From: sdv mailer <sdvmailer(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, steve(at)blighty(dot)com, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup
Date: 2004-05-06 17:06:41
Message-ID: 20040506170641.29916.qmail@web60203.mail.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I compared against both TCP and UNIX direct
connections. No SSL, no authentication. See benchmark
results posted below again:

Direct
------
0.144 sec. Client <--UNIX--> PG
0.152 sec. Client <--TCP--> PG

5x Faster
---------
0.027 sec. Client <--UNIX--> Pgpool <--UNIX--> PG
0.028 sec. Client <--UNIX--> Pgpool <--TCP--> PG

15x Slower
----------
2.39 sec. Client <--TCP--> Pgpool <--UNIX--> PG
2.40 sec. Client <--TCP--> Pgpool <--TCP--> PG



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Robinson 2004-05-06 17:07:42 Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup
Previous Message sdv mailer 2004-05-06 16:58:33 Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup