| From: | sdv mailer <sdvmailer(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, steve(at)blighty(dot)com, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup |
| Date: | 2004-05-06 15:30:01 |
| Message-ID: | 20040506153001.1211.qmail@web60204.mail.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pgpool connects to PostgreSQL on UNIX socket. I also
ran on TCP socket but there is no significant
difference if I recall correctly due to the inherent
nature of connection pooling or pre-fork technology.
;-)
--- Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> wrote:
> > However, when I tried TCP socket, Pgpool was
> actually
> > slower by 15x !! Perhaps you can clarify why the
> TCP
> > socket is so much slower?
>
> How did you have pgpool configured to connect to the
> database? Domain
> socket or tcpip?
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2004-05-06 15:47:13 | Re: ALTER TABLE TODO items |
| Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2004-05-06 15:27:10 | Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup |