From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | James Robinson <jlrobins(at)socialserve(dot)com> |
Cc: | bruno(at)wolff(dot)to, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: History of oids in postgres? |
Date: | 2004-05-05 17:03:30 |
Message-ID: | 200405051703.i45H3Uc22406@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
James Robinson wrote:
> Bruno et al,
>
> Any self-repsecting lurker would know that oids as row identifiers are
> depreciated in postgres. Can anyone provide a brief history regarding
> the reasoning behind using them as row identifiers in the first place?
> I see a discussion of their use as various primary keys in he system
> catalog in the oid-datatype doc page, but not regarding their history
> as 'user-space' row ids.
They were added at Berkeley and I think are related to the
Object-relational ability of PostgreSQL. I think the newer SQL
standards have a similar capability specified.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2004-05-05 17:31:01 | Re: Bug in optimizer |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-05-05 13:03:15 | Re: very high CPU usage in "top", but not in "mpstat" |